Bing improves its quality guidelines?
Everyone talks about Google's quality, nobody talks about Bing's — and yet Microsoft has just published a rather sensible vademecum on what makes a quality page.
Technical SEO, search intelligence, and the code behind it — notes from 20+ years of making websites work harder.
Everyone talks about Google's quality, nobody talks about Bing's — and yet Microsoft has just published a rather sensible vademecum on what makes a quality page.
Yahoo's search back-end has been switched over to Bing across twelve European countries. From an SEO standpoint, there's now one less algorithm to worry about.
Facebook's much-hyped announcement turned out to be something Google did three years earlier with Google Talk. If the idea was distracting from Google+, it didn't quite land.
Yahoo Site Explorer is on its way out — the only free backlink console worth a look is going, and Microsoft's plans for what's left are gradually taking shape.
Back in 2000 Google Directory launched to take on Yahoo's; eleven years later Google quietly retired it. A look back at why directories stopped scaling on the open web.
First it was doorway pages, then selling links, now buying them. Google's warnings in Webmaster Tools keep piling up — and the wording matters more than it seems.
Rankings are no longer enough to prove SEO is working. The whole point is free traffic — so it's analytics that tell you what's really going on.
Google extended rel=canonical to the HTTP header — so PDFs, videos and other non-HTML files can finally declare which version belongs in the index.
In SEO there is a mantra: Content is King. The time has come for it to change. A Google experiment links articles to author profiles — and the author starts to matter more.